Beau Brummel (1924): Sentimentality in the Movies

08 Jul

_B2H7bQ_mk_KGrHqIOKiIE_THWFYoEBMhPel_Sh__3I cried and cried and cried. It was embarrassing. I didn’t look at my sister, but I could feel that she was crying, too. When the movie ended, we looked at each other to see how the other was affected. She had tears streaming down her face and I had tears streaming down my face. We laughed, smiled and finished our cry.

I never used to be a particularly sentimental person, but after our mother passed away some years ago, we turned into the most sentimental, sappy, mushy, cry-at-the-drop-of-a-hat people you can imagine. And it is always the sappy movies that affects us the most. We never know kind of movie or book is going to touch us, I’m sometimes surprised: a movie might have tons of people die, but I won’t be affected, and then I’ll watching something else and turn into a basket case.

We’re not mushy about love stories and romance – we’re mushy about loss, death, and human suffering and loneliness. Beau Brummel – a silent movie made in 1924 – is about all of those things; a tragic romance. And since most movies don’t make me cry, I always feel any movie that does is worth looking at.

67astorsmithbeaubrummelI got Beau Brummel because I wanted to see Mary Astor and John Barrymore when they were younger…and Mary Astor is very young. Most remembered for her role as Brigid O’Shaughnessy in the 1941 The Maltese Falcon and for her mother roles at MGM in movies like Meet Me in St. Louis and Little Women, she got her start in silent pictures in the early nineteen-twenties when she was fourteen. Her breakthrough role was Beau Brummel. John Barrymore had seen a picture of her in a magazine and requested her for his leading lady. He said he was attracted by the caption, which read “On the brink of womanhood.” She was only seventeen and he was forty-two, but they had a passionate affair during the making of the film, and it shows (which doesn’t always occur – I’ve seen many off-screen couples with zero onscreen chemistry).

John Barrymore began as a stage actor – known for his Hamlet – and did several movies, but made his first cinematic impact in 1920 in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, which is a surprisingly effective horror/drama. I’d heard people mention his profile a lot, it was practically a joke, but I had only seen in him Midnight (1939 and also with Mary Astor), when he was older and physically suffering the effects of alcoholism. But I now know what they mean. It is a lovely profile. He is more handsome from the side than face forward and he looks years younger.

beau-brummel_19147_1257Beau Brummel is a historical person and the movie follows his life, though with an added love interest. The movie begins when the wealthy daughter of people in trade, Lady Margery (Astor) is about to marry up in the world. However, her real love is Lieutenant Brummel. They meet just before the wedding, trading impossibly lovely profiles, and in despair they part. He vows to get revenge on society, the kind of society that would force her to marry where she does not love because he is the son of a tailor. HIs revenge is a little unusual, however, which is to crash into society, become an accepted member of society and be the beau ideal of how society should look, dress, talk, act…and he succeeds. He becomes the companion of the Prince of Wales (who would become George IV) and makes quite a few enemies in the process.

The story spirals tragically from here (though it starts out pretty tragic). He manages to offend the prince, among other people, and must go into exile in France. There is another tragic parting between him and Lady Margery. This time, she asks him take to her with him, but he refuses, presumably for the same reason he didn’t run off with her in the beginning…his lack of fortune.

Annex%20-%20Barrymore,%20John%20(Beau%20Brummel)_NRFPT_02He lives in abject poverty and ages badly and the only person who has stood by him is his devoted servant, Mortimer. When the Prince of Wales (now the king) arrives in France with a huge entourage – that includes Lady Margery – he watches, a broken man, as the procession goes by. Lady Margery later visits him, telling him that her husband has died and asks him to marry her. Once again he refuses. This times it’s because he’s broken, he no longer has the heart to be with her, he’s so beaten down by life that he feels he has nothing to give anymore and there is another one of those tear-inducing partings. It’s truly painful.

More years pass and one can only imagine the loneliness and unhappiness that these people have experienced. He is now old, mad and in a debtor’s prison. His servant, Mortimer comes to visit and Brummel does not initially recognize him. When he does, it is a moment so poignant and pathetic that I dissolved into tears right there and never stopped until some time after the movie ended. In her own home, Lady Margery dies and her spirit, young once again, sits up and steps out of her body and into Brummel’s cell. As Mortimer watches in terrible sadness as Brummel hallucinates, Brummel finally dies. His spirit, also his young and idealized self, rises from his body and joins Lady Margery.

It sounds sappy. I think my dad found it melodramatic because he left one-third of the way through, but truthfully, it is a very moving film. It’s like opera – grand and glorious and beautiful with powerful emotions expressed lyrically. It’s a lyrical movie. You can’t approach it like you would a contemporary film just as you cannot expect an opera to be like a contemporary musical. I like opera, so there’s obviously a little melodramatic streak in me. When I mentioned how sad Beau Brummel was, most people said, “I guess you won’t want to watch that again,” but truthfully, I would. I loved it! It’s truly a timeless romance – timeless for the characters and timeless for us.

th1LVSKCA2There is a wonderful artice on the Nitrate Diva, called “Beau Brummel (1924): Deeply Superficial.” It is a excellent look at the movie and how superficial things (like clothes and physical beauty and even movies) cannot always be separated from the deeper, spiritual things of life. There is also a bit about John Barrymore, what a dandy is, as well as an appreciation of Mary Astor, along with the story of her real life romance with Barrymore. It is a beautifully written article that goes a long way to showing why this movie has such an emotion impact. She writes of that ending when their spirits are united, looking as they did when they were both young:

Why is it that our celluloid souls are supposed to look like ourselves—but in the prime of life, at our youthful pinnacle? Are we being superficial? Or perhaps we associate that beauty with hope and with the time in our existence when we still aspired to something. It probably goes back to the Middle Ages, when funerary statues were made to resemble the departed individual at the age of 33, since that was considered the “perfect age,” the age at which Christ had died. So, once again, we see that it’s not so easy to separate the superficial from the spiritual, the corporal from the ethereal.”

th0RTUPBJIIt’s achingly beautiful, with a modern score that’ll have you in tears just listening to it. Most silent movies did not have a score written for them so when the DVDs are released they have to provide music and the one for Beau Brummel is particularly good.

I don’t know why, but sentimentality often gets a bad rap or is considered unsophisticated. Sound of Music is often labeled sugary and sentimental and excessively positive for being a musical made in the ’60s (as if the fact that it was made in the ’60s is the problem). Beau Brummel is likewise sentimental, though less happy. Mary Poppins is called sentimental. Stella Dallas, with Barbara Stanwyck, made me cry and is blatantly melodramatic and moving. The Amazing Spider-Man 2, which wasn’t especially amazing, still had me crying hard at the end. Movies most likely to elicit an emotional response are these kinds of movies. I’ve talked to other people and they tell me it’s the same with them. It’s often the cheesy stuff that is most poignant. Somehow, these films touch on something fundamental within us, something in our souls, something universal.

Of course, one can’t live in a highly emotional state all the time, however cathartic it might be to cry sometimes. So my sister and I decided the next day to watch something unrelentingly upbeat and happy in Meet Me in St. Louis. Another sentimental movie, but happily so and it left us singing.


Posted by on July 8, 2014 in Movies


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

8 responses to “Beau Brummel (1924): Sentimentality in the Movies

  1. Hannah Barnes

    January 26, 2015 at 9:06 pm

    Hi Christina!

    We recently watched Beau Brummel. Thanks for the recommendation!

    First off, you’re totally right–we all agreed that John Barrymore looks waaaaay more handsome from the side than the front.

    I loved all of the quaint costumes and mannerisms. A number of scenes were also interesting from a historical perspective (such as the gun duel or how Lady Margery arrived at Beau’s house in a veil). The dialogue was also fun to read. We don’t talk about dandies anymore… 🙂

    I did cry at the end. What surprised me, though, was Nathaniel. When we started the movie, he was completely bored out of his skull (What, no sound or color?! The horror! D:). But when Beau was in prison and Mortimer came to visit him, Nathaniel started bawling. He kept crying even after the movie was over.

    Overall, I enjoyed watching it. Because it’s a silent film, most people would never take the time to watch it. It was a unique gem that I’m sure I would never have found otherwise!

    My best,


    • christinawehner

      January 27, 2015 at 12:00 am

      Hi Hannah!

      I’m so glad you enjoyed it and really excited you had a chance to see it! I write about so many movies, I never know if people are really interested in seeing them.

      I’m sorry it made Nathaniel so sad, though it is a tremendous testament to how moving that film is, despite being silent and in black and white. 🙂 That’s really amazing that he sat through it all. I agree with Nathaniel; that moment is really when the tears begin flowing.

      I didn’t think about the veil, but you are right…and dandies. In modern historical movies it seems a fashion to have girls running around without hats and men with their shirts romantically open as if they don’t care what they wear (did you ever see the 2005 Pride and Prejudice? It’s historically awful!).

      It’s such a different time and it felt like they captured it better than I’ve seen in most movies today. It is pretty mannered (John Barrymore was noted for a more emotive and grand acting style than some other silent actors), but I think that’s what adds to the sentiment of it, as if their emotions are so great they have to express them grandly.

      I’m so glad to hear from you and what you thought of the film!


  2. Elina Rojek

    January 20, 2016 at 1:26 pm

    Excellent Article. Hope to read more from you!

    Liked by 1 person


What Are Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: