The Fly (1958)

02 Nov

220px-TheflyposterAt the end of The Fly, I hardly knew whether to giggle or shudder. I tried a little of both. It’s that kind of movie. The concept is both chilling and silly.

The movie opens with a woman, Helene Delambre (Patricia Owens), in a warehouse who has just crushed a man’s head in a hydraulic press. She calls her brother-in-law, Francois Delambre (Vincent Price) and tells him she’s killed her husband, Andre (David Hedrison). Francois then calls the police. Inspector Charas (Herbert Marshall) thinks she must be insane. She’s obsessed with locating a certain house fly, one with a white head. Francois can’t imagine that she could do such a thing – he’s also always loved her, though he cared deeply for his brother, too. Finally, he gets her to tell him the truth, which is shown in a flashback, but is so incredible that Inspector Charas does not initially believe her. Not, he says, until they can show him the fly with the white head.

Most people coming into this film already know the plot, a scientist invents a teleportation device and when he tests himself in the device, a house fly gets mixed up in his DNA and he emerges part fly, with parts of his human self on the fly. But The Fly is framed as a mystery and I like how they build suspense, not because I am in the dark, but because the characters are in the dark. Inside the mystery framing is a flashback about Helene and Andre, their happy home, his ambition and his mistake that leads to tragedy.

The film really wants to deal with the theme of scientific hubris, the Frankenstein syndrome. A scientist is meddling with things he ought not to meddle with. Andre is all for progress and invention, but his wife is afraid at how fast things are changing. But it has occurred to me that the real problem with these kinds of scientists is not what they are trying to do. It is that they do it alone. It makes them prone to all sorts of silly errors, like putting an abnormal brain in their creation or not checking to make sure there is nothing else in the teleportation device except oneself. Really, such silly mistakes could easily be avoided by working with others.

Andre’s also unbelievably impetuous and reckless. He’s having some difficulty with his transporter, so what does he do? He tests it on the cat! I had a hard time forgiving him for that one (Griffin, in the novel The Invisible Man, also tests invisibility on the cat: the real message here seems to be that animal cruelty is always avenged with scientific catastrophe). And then Andre recklessly tests the device on himself.


David Hedrison is hiding his fly head under a blanket while his wife reacts to his fly arm – the film is actually in lush color

The plot, to be honest, doesn’t make the most amount of sense. Why does Andre decide to destroy all his research, as if it was the research itself that was the problem? And perhaps if he’d enlisted aid outside of his wife, more could have been done and he could have been saved. And why does he retain his mind when he’s lost his head and acquired a fly head? Perhaps I’m over-analyzing this. If you can accept the basic premise of the film, it’s rather compelling.

What makes it compelling is partially the setting. It’s a normal, domestic setting for such a freak accident. The real heart of the story is actually not Andre, but his wife, Helene. We see everything in the flashback from her perspective, the horror of finding a fly head on her beloved husband. Andre keeps his fly head covered for much of the time and we only see it when she does and we come to realize as she does that the fly DNA is gradually taking over his instincts. We sense her sense of futility at the impossibility of trying to find a fly (Andre needs the fly with the white head so that he can put himself and the fly through the disintegrator-integrator device in the hope that it will unscramble their respective DNA). Imagine trying to locate one household fly, which could be anywhere. And then she freely admits to killing her husband, but then acts insane in an effort to shield her son, Phillipe (Charles Herbert), from what happened. She’d rather Phillipe have a mother who’s mad than hung.

Vincent Price has the rather unusual role of Andre’s brother. Unlike his brilliant, scientific brother, he is the boring, understanding and steady type who has always loved Helene, but is not jealous of his brother and is also a caring uncle. It’s a more understated role for him, but he’s still good. I think his mere presence serves to lend more credibility to the plot than it could otherwise have.

Herbert Marshall, Charles Herbert, and Vincent Price

Herbert Marshall, Charles Herbert, and Vincent Price

The role of Inspector Charas is played by Herbert Marshall, another veteran actor who I’ve always had a weak spot for. One of my favorite movies as a child was The Secret Garden with Margaret O’Brien and he played Mr. Craven. As Inspector Charas, he gives a sympathetic, but no-nonsense, performance. He is trying to handle the matter delicately – since he believes Helene to be insane – but no matter how much Francois begs him, he must issue a warrant for her arrest. I think his general no-nonsense performance also lends credibility, especially to an ending that  could have been laughable farce.

Apparently, Price and Marshall did have trouble filming the final scene because they were laughing so hard, though you wouldn’t know from watching the film. I laughed when I first heard the voice, “help me!” in a squeaky tone. It is the fly, with a man’s head and arm (since Andre has the fly’s head and arm), trapped in a spider’s-web, with a spider bearing down and about to eat it. Somehow, Charas’ utter horror sells it, as he crushes both the spider and the fly with a rock. But now that he’s killed a fly with a man’s head, he feel just as morally culpable as Helene, who killed a man with a fly’s head. He and Francois instead manage to come up with a story about how Andre committed suicide and Helene is not arrested. It’s certainly a memorable ending, even if I still can’t decide whether to laugh or shudder.


Posted by on November 2, 2015 in Movies


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

8 responses to “The Fly (1958)

  1. Silver Screenings

    November 4, 2015 at 4:40 am

    You’re absolutely right re: scientists working alone and making careless mistakes. In fact, I think an entire blogathon could be dedicated to this subject.

    I haven’t seen this film – only the later film with the fab Jeff Goldblum – but I enjoyed your analysis so much, I need to suss it out. (Ooh – and it’s on YouTube!)

    Re: Price and Marshall laughing during the final scene… Sometimes it amazes me how actors can do funny scenes (whether intentional or not) with a straight face. I could never do it, which is what makes them the professionals, no?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Silver Screenings

      November 4, 2015 at 4:44 am

      Ooh – it’s in CinemaScope, too! … Not that I’ve started watching it, when I should be doing a million other things…

      Liked by 1 person

      • christinawehner

        November 4, 2015 at 10:55 am

        But it’s valuable research! I always tell people that when I’m watching movies, I’m doing important research (hopefully not like those mad scientists). 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      November 4, 2015 at 10:53 am

      You’re right, that would be a fun blogathon! There seem to be a ton of these lone scientist types: Dr. Jekyll, the invisible man (though working alone seems to work out okay for Doc in Back to the Future).

      That’s a good point about actors’ ability to still convince, even when they are laughing. It seems like it would especially be a problem for actors in horror movies. I have so much respect for people like Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi and Vincent Price for how much gravitas they bring to sometimes very silly plots.

      I haven’t seen the Jeff Goldblum version yet. It sounded a bit gory for me (though Jeff Goldblum is always so good!).

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Silver Screenings

    November 7, 2015 at 10:43 am

    Okay, I’ve been giving this a lot of thought and I would really like to do a “Lone Scientist” or “Mad Scientist” blogathon. It would be a blast. Maybe hold it in the new year, maybe late February? Would you be interested in co-hosting?


    • christinawehner

      November 7, 2015 at 11:54 am

      That would be tremendous fun! I would love to co-host! I have not actually participated in a blogathon before, so I am not as familiar with how it is done, but I have the general idea. 🙂 Late February sounds perfect (and is a month always in need of fun).

      You’ve inspired me to make a list of all the lone, mad scientists I can think of…


      • Silver Screenings

        November 7, 2015 at 1:10 pm

        Fabulous! I am an old hand at these things, and I can guide us through. Do you have an email address on your website? I can email you later with some ideas.


        • christinawehner

          November 7, 2015 at 1:58 pm

          Exciting! My email is not on my website, but I have a means of contacting me on my About Me page, which goes to my email, and I can email back.

          Liked by 1 person


What Are Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: