Dial M For Murder (1954)

27 Apr

dialmformurderposterBecause Dial M For Murder is an unusually close adaptation of a successful play, it does not seem to garner the same attention that other Hitchcock films do. There is simply less to say about Hitchcock as auteur. But as a masterful film of suspense, red-herrings, and the overlooked little things that trip one up, it cannot be topped. I never tire of watching it; there seems to be something new to see each time.

The film begins with Margo Wendice (Grace Kelly), sitting in white at the breakfast table and enjoying a demure kiss with her husband, former tennis star Tony Wendice (Ray Milland). Next, it is evening and she is in a flaming red dress and enjoying a passionate kiss with mystery writer Mark Halliday (Robert Cummings), who is her former lover. They have broken off the relationship and believe that Tony knows nothing about it. He’s changed, Margo tells Mark. He’s a more attentive husband now.

And for good reason. In fairness, I should warn that this post is rife with plot spoilers. If you have never seen it before, it is a stimulating experience to watch the story unfold without prior knowledge. My only warning is that it’s a film you have to pay close attention to. There are a lot of red-herrings.

Tony, it turns out, knows everything about Margo and Mark’s affair. He married Margo for her money and when he realized that she could leave him flat, he concocted a scheme that was a year in the making. He’s going to blackmail an old school fellow from Cambridge, Swan (Anthony Dawson) – a man constantly skating “on thin ice” – into killing his wife for him. He has everything planned down to the last detail and it is a marvel as he calmly unfurls his plan to Swan, a man who is no slouch himself when it comes to criminal scheming, but has nothing on Tony.

But as mystery-writer Mark discusses with Tony and Margo, murders are only perfect on paper. People do not always behave exactly as you expect them to. Owing to a small change in the behavior of Margo earlier in the evening, instead of being murdered by Swan, she manages to kill him in self-defense with a pair of scissors. Tony’s year of planning is a shambles, but he quickly contrives a second plan, which seems to work much better. With the judicious planting of a few telling objects, he make it look like Margo deliberately murdered Swan. The police, lead by Inspector Hubbard (John Williams), seem to fall exactly in line and she is convicted of murder.

Robert Cummings, Grace Kelly, Ray Milland

Robert Cummings, Grace Kelly, Ray Milland – an insincere lot of people in this moment

To me, the most fascinating part of this film is watching people think, especially Ray Milland as Tony. There are moments when he realizes that he has miscalculated, but everything still seems to fall his way. Will he succeed? Will he not? What is going to finally trip him up? The film is full of red-herrings. For example, part of Tony’s original plan was to call his wife on the phone while Swan kills her. But he’s late and we, as the audience, are convinced that his lateness is what is going to save her life. But ironically, it is something that happened earlier, that we’ve already forgotten about, that saves her life.

Earlier in the evening, she didn’t want to stay home alone while Tony and Mark went to a stag party and he had to convince her, suggesting it was an ideal time to paste his press clippings into an album. He persuades her, but as a result her scissors are on the desk instead of in her mending basket, providing her an ideal weapon.

Even Mark Halliday is a red-herring. Because he’s a mystery writer, one keeps expecting him to be the one to bring Tony down. But in what is the finest twist, the police actually turn out to be rather good at their job. As Inspector Hubbard says, “The saints preserve us from the gifted amateur!”

John Williams played the role of Inspector Hubbard on Broadway and reprised it for the film. He initially seems like your stereotypical British officer, conscientious, following his own line of reasoning and apparently missing the important details. The first time I watched this movie I maligned him twice. I thought he was a stupid policeman, began to rethink it as he seemed to be getting at something important and then impugned him again when he appeared to drop it. Williams is perfect, lending the character sympathy and kindness towards Margo, impatience with Mark and complete satisfaction when he gets his man. He even gets the last shot of the film, brushing his mustache with pleased self-congratulation.

John Williams as Inspector Hubbard during the play's Broadway run

John Williams as Inspector Hubbard during the play’s Broadway run

Grace Kelly and Robert Cummings are perfectly fine in the film, but it really belongs to Ray Milland (with Williams coming in second). He’s smooth, sophisticated, and believes he has all the answers…which largely he does. But as much as he might feel like he owns people (as he says he feels about Swan), he doesn’t. He’s awfully good at it, though. He says he puts himself in the place of others to see what they will do.

But everyone does that to a certain extent, which is another part of the fascination of the film. Everyone thinks, realizes, and put themselves in each other’s shoes to arrive at the exact same conclusion at the end. Sherlock Holmes would be proud at how they logically arrive at the only possible solution.

Given all the red-herrings, this last time I was finally able to isolate the three things that undid Tony. They are the scissors, the latchkeys and the money. Three things that seem innocuous and – in the case of the money and the scissors especially – things we completely forget about.


Posted by on April 27, 2016 in Movies


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

20 responses to “Dial M For Murder (1954)

  1. Joshua Wilson

    April 27, 2016 at 11:43 am

    I watched this one for the first time this year and wrote about it as well. Great film, thanks for sharing your thoughts on what makes it work.


  2. Vienna

    April 27, 2016 at 12:11 pm

    John Williams almost steals the film! Not so keen on Robert Cummings. Milland obviously had the better part, though I always thought he looked a bit too mature for a professional tennis player!


    • christinawehner

      April 27, 2016 at 12:26 pm

      Yes, I know what you mean about Cummings…he doesn’t really do much. I kept expecting him to, but he never does. But John Williams, as you say, is amazing! I feel so guilty for maligning him.

      Admittedly, it is a little hard to picture Milland as a tennis star in that film. 🙂


  3. wolffianclassicmoviesdigest

    April 27, 2016 at 12:36 pm

    I love dail


  4. The Animation Commendation

    April 28, 2016 at 7:38 am

    This is on my list of movies to see!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Quiggy

    May 1, 2016 at 11:56 am

    This is one of Hitchcock’s I haven’t seen yet. I stopped at the warning of plot spoilers and will come back to this review after i’ve had a chance to watch it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      May 2, 2016 at 8:51 am

      You know, I almost didn’t put a plot spoiler warning, but so I’m glad I did! I hope you get a chance to see it and enjoy it!


  6. Eric Binford

    May 2, 2016 at 1:41 pm

    It’s an underrated movie. Hitch himself dismissed it. He needed something he could shoot quickly while he was preparing Rear Window. Yet, as you said, it’s a fascinating movie. It takes place inside an apartment, but Hitch is always putting the camera behind something thus creating a visually dense movie. And it’s filled with great ironies and bits of black humor. I always thought that the funniest thing about the movie is that Grace Kelly is cheating on stylish Milland with boring Cummings. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      May 2, 2016 at 2:57 pm

      I never thought of that, but that is pretty ironic about cheating on Milland! I’m glad Hitchcock shot the movie, even if it was only to pass the time. I always thought it was one of his more amusing ones, which isn’t to say he doesn’t use humor in all his films, but this one always particularly struck my funny bone, even though it’s about murder.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Silver Screenings

    May 5, 2016 at 2:59 pm

    I had the opportunity to see this in 3D on the big screen, and it was great! Loved your review and your analysis. Like you said, this film has lots of decoys – and for a film that’s basically set in one room, there is lots of tension and plot twists. Time to see it again!

    Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      May 5, 2016 at 8:57 pm

      How awesome that must have been to see it on the big screen! Did you feel the 3D added a lot to the experience?I was surprised to learn it was filmed in 3D and have been extremely interested to know what that brings to the experience.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Silver Screenings

        May 6, 2016 at 4:38 am

        I felt the 3D made it richer visually – the apartment didn’t seem so flat. I thought it was very effective in the scene where Grace Kelly is on the phone & is attacked. Personally, I think the 3D format was worth the effort.

        Liked by 1 person


What Are Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: