RSS

Foreign Correspondent (1940)

13 Aug

1138Foreign Correspondent was the second movie that Alfred Hitchcock made in American, following the Gothic, psychological romance Rebecca with a WWII thriller. Actually, the film is only somewhat a WWII thriller. Take out the epilogue and one would hardly know, though there’s a lot of talk about a coming war in Europe.

The editor of the New York Globe – Powers (Harry Davenport) – is frustrated with his foreign correspondents in Europe. All they can give him is speculation about the coming of war with no hard facts. It’s driving him nuts, so he chooses Johnny Jones (Joel McCrea) to go to Europe, a scrappy journalist who got into a fight with a policeman in pursuit of a story and has no particular agenda or political bent.

“What Europe needs is a fresh, unused mind,” Powers observes. So Johnny Jones is sent to Amsterdam with a new name – Huntley Haverstock, provided by Powers – and orders to interview a Dutch politician named Van Meer (Albert Basserman), who is central to the negotiations for peace. Johnny is also put into contact with the British Stephen Fisher (Herbert Marshall), who is head of the Universal Peace Party, which is about to hold an important conference. In the meantime, Johnny also falls in love with Fisher’s daughter, Carol (Laraine Day)

In many ways, Foreign Correspondent feels similar to North By Northwest. Simple American gets mixed up in foreign intrigue and is on the run. Van Meer is assassinated….no, wait… he’s actually abducted. There is a secret clause to a peace treaty that the villains (it’s not mentioned, but they are understood to be Nazis) wish to know from Van Meer. The plot is, however, unlike North By Northwest in that there is a lot of it, a lot of characters and it’s a bit confusing at times.

But the film itself is extremely entertaining, full of wit, with some terrific thrills and memorable scenes and a cast that has a lot to offer. I’ve always loved Herbert Marshall’s voice and as Fisher he makes an excellent, unexpected villain. The secret is that his character is really German (was his name originally Fischer…he just dropped the c?). But he’s a villain with one, glaring weakness. He loves his daughter and in some ways, he’s one of Hitchcock’s least evil villains. He even gets to have a heroic end.

George Sanders also gets to play against type…this time as a good guy. Scott folliott (when his ancestor lost his head to Henry VIII, his ancestor’s wife dropped the capital letter to”commemorate the occasion”). He’s a journalist, too, one of those daring young British types who always makes a joke in the face of danger.

Edmund Gwenn gets a delightful role as Rowley, a cockney assassin who keeps trying to kill Johnny without sucess. Robert Benchley makes an appearance as a dyspeptic correspondent who is now reduced to drinking milk and taking pills and Albert Basserman is the heartfelt voice of the little people against the fascists (his speech in defiance of the Nazis in the middle of the film always drew applause in 1940).

Joel McCrea is one of those actors I seem to like the more I see him. He’s not a flashy actor – I’ve heard him called the poor man’s Gary Cooper, which seems unfair – but he has a central integrity, charm, capable of snark, but also of sweetness…also sincerity, without ever taking himself too seriously. He always seems willing for a joke to be at his expense and to look a little silly. He’s more of an every man than Cary Grant, but a bit more articulate than Gary Cooper.

Laraine Day is not your typical Hitchcock blonde heroine, but the film’s all the better for it. She’s one of the most normal, well-adjusted of all Hitchcock’s heroines (despite having a Nazi for a father)  and the romance between McCrea and Day is unusually sweet for a Hitchcock film.

There are also some wonderful scenes that are very unique to Hitchcock. An assassination in the driving rain, on the steps to a building, then darting away underneath a sea of umbrellas. Sneaking around the inside of a curiously expressionistic windmill. A plane crash in the middle of an ocean. Escape from assassins through a bathroom window in nothing but underwear and a robe.

There are a few moments that mark the film out as having been made specifically during WWII, such as Albert Basserman’s role as Van Meer. But the prevailing ethos is that of Johnny and Scott ffoliott as reporters out for a scoop…somewhat like His Girl Friday. Theoretically, they’re doing it for patriotic reasons, but mostly their just doing it because they’re reporters and they’ve happened on the biggest scoop short of a declaration of war (which does come in the middle of the film). It is Carol and her father who are the ones motivated by patriotism (though admittedly patriotism to separate countries).

The ending, however, is the most striking example of a wartime message. It was added after the end of the film’s shooting and when real-life London was under attack from German air raids. In the film, Johnny is giving the news via radio to America when an air raid occurs and the lights go out and he is forced to modify his message, exhorting America to keep the lights burning, so to speak. It is a direct appeal from Britain to America in 1940, though America wouldn’t get into the war until the end of 1941.

This post was written for The Alfred Hitchcock Blogathon. Thanks so much to Coffee, Classics, & Craziness for hosting!!! Be sure to read all the other posts on Hitchcock.

murder

 

Advertisements
 
9 Comments

Posted by on August 13, 2016 in Movies

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 responses to “Foreign Correspondent (1940)

  1. evaschon

    August 13, 2016 at 7:46 pm

    George Sanders playing a good guy? This I’ve got to see! 🙂

    ~Eva

    Liked by 1 person

     
    • christinawehner

      August 13, 2016 at 7:55 pm

      Yes, I know what you mean! When I first saw him in the film, I kept expecting to find out that he was really a villain. 🙂

      Like

       
  2. Charles W. Callahan

    August 16, 2016 at 3:54 pm

    One of my favorite Hitchcocks. Robert Benchely is wonderful. He not only did some of his own dialogue, he worked on other scenes. Funny how Benchley and his friend Dorothy Parker both worked with Hitch.

    Liked by 1 person

     
    • christinawehner

      August 16, 2016 at 9:52 pm

      Yes, this one’s been growing on me in a big way. I liked it the first time, but really enjoyed it this last time.

      Benchley did a great job on his dialogue! I wonder if he always was responsible for his own dialogue in his films – they all seem to bare his brand of humor.

      Like

       
  3. Michaela

    August 17, 2016 at 8:41 pm

    I really enjoy this film, but oddly enough, I always forget about it…? It’s a Hitchcock picture through and through, yet it’s probably one of his most underrated. Every time I watch it, I’m reminded of how good it is. Hitch actually wanted Gary Cooper for the lead, which I would have loved to have seen, but Joel McCrea consistently impresses me and I think he does well as a Hitchcock hero. The rest of your observations are spot-on as well!

    Liked by 1 person

     
    • christinawehner

      August 17, 2016 at 9:34 pm

      Yeah, it does seem to fly under the radar, doesn’t it? I was a little lukewarm the first time I saw it, but really enjoyed it this last time. It’s so much fun, but maybe you’re right – it doesn’t really stick with one…which maybe allows it to feel fresh on a subsequent viewing.

      It would have been cool to see Gary Cooper in an Alfred Hitchcock film!

      Like

       
  4. Silver Screenings

    August 20, 2016 at 4:54 am

    Can’t believe I haven’t seen this! Ah well, based on your review, I have enjoyable viewing ahead.

    I like the idea of George Sanders as a good guy but, like you, I would keep expecting him to reveal himself as a villain.

    Liked by 1 person

     
    • christinawehner

      August 20, 2016 at 12:27 pm

      It is curious how this one seems to be less known….maybe because Hitchcock made so many great films that some simply slide under the radar. If anyone else had directed it, maybe it would have been better known?

      It is awfully fun to see Sanders as a good guy! Sometimes, I wish he had played more heroes, though he is always delightful as a villain.

      Liked by 1 person

       

What Are Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: