Our Mutual Friend – Charles Dickens

20 Mar

Our Mutual Friend is Charles Dickens last completed novel (he would die before finishing The Mystery of Edwin Drood), serialized in 1864-65. My first introduction to the story came with the 1998 BBC adaptation, which is excellent, and it has remained one of Dickens’ novels that I enjoy the most.

Some critics have said that the River Thames (always just called “the river” in the story) is the true main character of the book. Filthy and polluted, the river is a source of both life and death. People earn their living on the river, drown and are resurrected in the river, follow the river towards their destination. It seems to contain all that is both good and horrible in England and much of the story and characters are connected to it in one way or another.

On the death of the old miser John Harmon, who made a fortune with dust mounds (he basically collected, removed and recycled rubbish), his long-banished son, also called John Harmon, must return to collect his fortune. But in order to inherit, the will indicates that he must marry a young lady called Bella Wilfer, whom he has never met. But a body is found in the river and it is believed to be his body. The money then passes to Mr. and Mrs. Boffin, good and unpretentious servants to Harmon.

As in all Dickens novels, it’s difficult to summarize his books because there are so many characters, whose plots weave in and out of each other’s. The body in the river is found by Gaffer Hexam, who earns a living stealing from the bodies he finds in the river. His daughter is Lizzie, who attracts the interest of the usually bored gentleman, Eugene Wrayburn. Lizzie also attracts the interest of her brother’s “decent” headmaster, a man who has been called the Norman Bates of Victorian literature: Bradley Headstone. Everything about him is described as decent, yet nearly everyone who comes into contact with him can palpably sense that something is off.

Mr. Boffin soon acquires a mysterious secretory named John Rokesmith, who falls in love with Bella Wilfer. Rogue Riderhood, who claims to be “a[n] honest man as gets my living by the sweat of my brow” working on the river, in reality lives up to his name of Rogue. The Jewish Mr. Riah is Dickens’ attempt to atone for creating the evil Jewish Fagin. Riah is kind and sympathetic and becomes the surrogate father to Jenny Wren, a friend of Lizzie’s. Mrs. Higden is the poor woman who possesses a horror of the workhouse. Con artists, villains, innocents, and unforgettable characters abound.

Gaffer Hexam and Lizzie look for bodies in the river – illustrated by Marcus Stone

Besides the river, another theme that seems to be consistent throughout the entire story is that of stalking. Everyone seems to be stalking someone, whether for good or ill. Stalking them, watching them, loving them from a distance, resenting them, searching for them, testing them. At one point Bradley Headstone is stalking Eugene Wrayburn, who is looking for Lizzie. The line between love and obsession seems a thin one at times.

Another theme, of course, is that of greed and the corrosive effect of it on people. Greed and lust for money – miserliness once one has money. Not to mention murder, jealousy, lust, greed, hatred, obsession, indifference…

Perhaps one of my favorite parts of the novel is this quote from Mr. Twemlow, an insignificant member of Society (Society being an entity that requires capitalization) who startles everyone by bursting forth at the end of the book after spending eight hundred pages being passed over and ignored and used more as a useful appendage at Society gatherings. I like this quote because it provides a more expansive definition of love. Love is a word used so often that it becomes nearly meaningless, but Mr. Twemlow inadvertently provides a beautiful description of love’s varied facets (which I will put in bold letters). Mr. Twemlow is referring to a marriage contracted by a gentleman to a woman from the bottom of society that has turned Society aghast (operating like a sort of hollow Greek chorus providing commentary on the events of the story, but woefully out of touch and bound by their rules and self-congratulations).

‘A gentleman can have no feelings who contracts such a marriage,’ flushes Podsnap.

‘Pardon me, sir,’ says Twemlow, rather less mildly than usual, ‘I don’t agree with you. If this gentleman’s feelings of gratitude, of respect, of admiration, and affection, induced him (as I presume they did) to marry this lady–‘

‘This lady!’ echoes Podsnap.

‘Sir,’ returns Twemlow, with his wristbands bristling a little, ‘YOU repeat the word; I repeat the word. This lady. What else would you call her, if the gentleman were present?’

This being something in the nature of a poser for Podsnap, he merely waves it away with a speechless wave.

‘I say,’ resumes Twemlow, ‘if such feelings on the part of this gentleman, induced this gentleman to marry this lady, I think he is the greater gentleman for the action, and makes her the greater lady. I beg to say, that when I use the word, gentleman, I use it in the sense in which the degree may be attained by any man. The feelings of a gentleman I hold sacred, and I confess I am not comfortable when they are made the subject of sport or general discussion.’

Gratitude, respect, admiration, and affection live on, though Society is too blinkered to notice.


Posted by on March 20, 2017 in Books


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

12 responses to “Our Mutual Friend – Charles Dickens

  1. stephencwinter

    March 20, 2017 at 2:03 pm

    I was going to say that I remember the BBC adaptation of Our Mutual Friend but then I realised that what I remember is the effect that it had upon me. What I recall is darkness and the Thames as a sinister presence. Dickens began his career with all the optimism, warmth and vibrancy of The Pickwick Papers and ended it with the gloom of Our Mutual Friend and Edwin Drood. The adaptations that the BBC made of Dickens have always had a great influence on me so thank you for reminding me of them.

    Liked by 2 people

    • christinawehner

      March 20, 2017 at 2:21 pm

      Yes, it is a very dark one! I always remember the score that went with the credits for that one, too. Though I didn’t find it quite as dark as Bleak House (as a novel or adaptation). It is interesting how his view of life became so much darker. I was reading about his life recently and he seems to have been such a fundamentally unhappy man by the end.


  2. The Animation Commendation

    March 20, 2017 at 2:27 pm

    I never heard of this Dickens book before.

    Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      March 20, 2017 at 2:34 pm

      It’s definitely not as well known as some of his others – and the plot is pretty elephantine and harder to distill than some of his others. I really only first heard of it because I found the BBC adaptation at the library once. It’s a pretty good adaptation, actually!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. FictionFan

    March 20, 2017 at 5:13 pm

    It’s a strange one this – far less humour than is usual for Dickens, and the characters less caricatured. And the resolution is so clumsy. I still loved it because of his wonderful writing, but I couldn’t agree with those critics who claim it as one of his greatest, if not THE greatest, of his books. But even a less great Dickens is still greater than the vast majority of books… 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      March 20, 2017 at 8:30 pm

      Very true!! I think my affection for the book partly stems from my enjoyment of the miniseries, but I have to agree – it is not as great as some of his others.

      What do you consider to be his greatest? I kind of think Bleak House, Little Dorrit (which might also be my favorite), and Great Expectations…though those are not original picks. 🙂


      • FictionFan

        March 21, 2017 at 4:14 pm

        Bleak House for definite – the best book ever written, and I’ll fight anyone who says it’s not! 😉 After that, it gets harder for such a huge fan as I am – David Copperfiled and Nicholas Nickleby would be my obvious choices, but I also love A Tale of Two Cities, and was very taken with Martin Chuzzlewit when I re-read it recently. University ruined Great Expectations through over-analysis, unfortunately. Pickwick Papers is another favourite, though it’s very different from the rest, and I adore A Christmas Carol as much as any of the novels really. Ha! The list of ones I don’t like would be much shorter… 😉

        Liked by 1 person

        • christinawehner

          March 21, 2017 at 8:43 pm

          Martin Chuzzlewit was the one that turned me into a fan!! I’d read David Copperfield when I was pretty young (but I want to read it again this year or the next), but there was something about his humor that really appealed to me in Martin Chuzzlewit.

          That is so sad about over-analysis!! I wonder if they realize what a disservice they do to literature when they do that. 😦

          I really want to read Nicholas Nickleby…it’s one of three I still haven’t read yet.

          Liked by 1 person

  4. Patricia Nolan-Hall (@CaftanWoman)

    March 22, 2017 at 7:19 am

    I just asked for a copy of this for my upcoming birthday. My only connection is to the 1970s mini-series. Birthdays. 1970s. I must be getting old.

    I am sure I will appreciate the work now after your article.

    Liked by 1 person

    • christinawehner

      March 22, 2017 at 11:11 am

      Happy slightly early birthday! 🙂 I hope you really enjoy the book!

      Not old at all – I think we only get better and more knowledgeable! Was the ’70s series good? I am always looking for good news Dickens adaptations to see.


      • Patricia Nolan-Hall (@CaftanWoman)

        March 22, 2017 at 1:54 pm

        The series was excellent. It was a time when Masterpiece Theatre never disappointed, and was must-see television. Things coming out of Britain at that time, especially these first run series, had an air of something special about them and this was certainly memorable.

        Liked by 1 person

        • christinawehner

          March 22, 2017 at 4:45 pm

          That must have been exciting! It seems like so many British novels (and novels in general) really need a miniseries to do them full justice.



What Are Your Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: